Point of view: EU military cooperation needs to step up a gear

Written by Ben Jones on Tuesday, 14 May 2013. Posted in Global Security, News, Defence, Point of View

The F35 Lightning II.

In December, the European Council will hold a major summit on the Common Security and Defence Policy in December. Turning to defence and security might seem like light relief for Europe's leaders given the stresses and strains of the Eurozone crisis. Yet, as a number of recent think-tank reports make clear, the challenges facing European defence and security are more than a side-show.

Both issues have their roots in the economic crisis. Europe's austerity budgets have hit defence spending hard. Britain has cut deeply since the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review, and the recently published Livre Blanc will make a similar dent on French military spending. In the absence of a Cold War like threat, defence budgets will always be a softer touch than public services. And despite successes in Libya and Mali, failures in Iraq and Afghanistan have done little to build public confidence in the ability of the West to deploy military force to good effect.

In fact, the economic crisis hit defence budgets that bit harder because of longer-term weaknesses. While countries like Britain and France are reluctant to wind in their global aspirations and broad range of military capabilities, their treasuries have not provided the funding to match. Meanwhile, the rising cost of those capabilities, often involving complex, cutting-edge procurements, outstrips average inflation rates. In essence, Europe's military capabilities, while still impressive in relative terms, are in decline, and there is no sign of this changing in the foreseeable future.

Not a problem, perhaps, if geo-political trends were all benign. A report by the Paris-based EU Institute for Security Studies makes for sober reading. It claims there are three trends that should be keeping Europe's leaders awake at night. Firstly, globalisation continues to make the world a smaller place. Europe cannot and will not be able to hide from the effects of instability, whether in near or faraway places. Secondly, the rise of China and the increasing economic importance of the East, has prompted the US to prioritise its security interests in Asia over those in Europe. Finally, a new revolution in military affairs in the form missile defence technologies, remote-controlled and robotic technologies and directed energy weapons, cyber warfare and laser technologies that seem to bring the science fiction of Star Wars to life.

The EUISS authors, accepting that national defence budgets will be stretched for the foreseeable future, make a strong and nuanced argument for deeper European cooperation. Emphasising that what they are advocating is "not a Euro-military", but a web of cooperative activities to make for more efficient and effective spending, unified as far as possible around a common strategic assessment. Central to their solution is much greater use of pooling and sharing capabilities, not just military equipment, but facilities, training and cooperation on doctrine.

Good for UK in Europe?
1=Very Bad. 5=Neutral. 9=Very Good

9.0/9 rating (1 votes)

Point of View: Europe undefended

Written by Denis MacShane on Friday, 19 April 2013. Posted in News, Defence

Point of View: Europe undefended

Amongst his many problems, France’s President Hollande has a tricky decision to make. He has to decide soon whether France’s military budget falls below the 2 per cent of GDP level set by Nato as the minimum to be taken seriously as a military puissance. France is scheduled to produce a white paper on defence which will decide whether France a military power with at least modest global reach.

As always in France three options are being discussed. The lowest budget spend would take French military spending down to 1.3 per cent of GDP. No more rapid deployment forces backed by warplanes to knock Islamists back from their attempted conquest of Mali.

The contents of the defence white paper – written by a committee which included the British ambassador to France, Sir Peter Ricketts – is being leaked as different factions jockey for the president’s ear.

Regional papers in France are printing horror stories about base closures and the removal of regiments which ever since Napoleon’s time have been stationed in every French region so that the military were fully integrated into the fabric of French state administration.

France would thus join Britain as a shrinking military nation. In last month’s UK budget setting out spending for the next years the Ministry of Defence suffered the biggest cuts of any government department. Britain’s national security officials are desperately massaging defence figures to keep total spend around 2 per cent but with polls indicating a change of government after 2015, the chances of a beleaguered Labour-led administration spending new money on defence are zero. The imperatives of spending on education, health and welfare to secure re-election for governments in Europe’s lost decade trump any national security demands on taxpayer’s money.

Britain and France are slowly becoming members of the Euro Defence Club of Germany, Spain, Italy, Denmark or Sweden where defence spending as a share of GDP is just a shade above 1 per cent. According to the London-based security think tank IISS, European NATO members’ defence spending in 2012 was, in real terms, around 11% lower than in 2006.            

Good for UK in Europe?
1=Very Bad. 5=Neutral. 9=Very Good

1.0/9 rating (1 votes)

[12 3 4 5  >>  

Recent News

  • All
  • Competition
  • Prosperity
  • Poverty
  • Power
  • Security
load more / hold SHIFT key to load all load all

User Login